What happens when 41.5% of website visitors reject cookies? 🍪Recently looked up some stats in one of the consent banner providers, and found out that across 45,882 consent decisions, 58.5% of users granted at least some consent, while 41.5% rejected all optional cookies.
This rejection rate creates a significant measurement gap. Activity from a large share of visitors may not be fully captured in analytics and advertising platforms – including traffic sources, page engagement, downloads, form submissions and other conversions.
This affects more than just reporting; it hurts the whole strategy. High-performing channels may appear less effective than they really are (Google Ads may show 3 times less conversions than it delivers, for instance, and the rest goes into direct traffic), cost per lead may be overstated, remarketing audiences become smaller, etc. As a result, marketing budgets may be allocated using incomplete data.
The solution is not to bypass user consent of course. It is to improve the consent banner experience, strengthen CRM and server-side tracking where appropriate, and regularly compare consent platform data with actual leads and sales. It can give some estimations to think about. That’s what we call “modelled conversions” in marketing jargon 🙂
When two out of every five visitors are not fully measurable, reported performance should be treated as only part of the picture – not the complete customer journey.
